ArticleBJPsych open2026
Physical health and activity management in forensic mental healthcare: hospital practices and staff insights from an Australian national study.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is currently no national approach to physical health and activity management for individuals under forensic mental healthcare.
aimsThis study aims to document the physical health and activity management of in-patients under forensic mental healthcare across Australia, physical activity opportunities and how data are recorded. It also explores staff perspectives on physical health and activity needs of forensic in-patients.
methodForensic hospital staff with expertise in managing the physical health and activity of in-patients were invited to participate in a mixed-methods study.
resultsTwenty-two surveys were completed and 64 staff members participated in 17 focus groups. Eight themes were identified: (a) lack of a standardised approach to physical health and activity; (b) inconsistent monitoring and documentation; (c) importance of general practitioners and multidisciplinary teams; (d) need for structured, adaptable programmes and engaged staff; (e) challenges related to patients, staff, ethics and infrastructure; (f) gaps in education, engagement and awareness; (g) need to balance nutrition and eating autonomy; and (h) importance of developing and implementing interventions.
conclusionsForensic hospitals in Australia lack a standardised approach to physical health and activity management, with inconsistent monitoring. Physical activity interventions require engaged staff, resources and flexibility, yet ethical and logistical barriers complicate implementation. Solutions include investing in specialised staff, scheduling physical activity into patients' routines and integrating information technology systems. Comprehensive policies for assessment, monitoring, nutrition, physical activity and interventions are important for improving in-patient forensic mental healthcare, and key performance indicators should be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.