ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2026
Enhanced Molecular Staging of Pancreatic Cancer Using Methylated DNA Markers in Peritoneal Lavage Fluid.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced Molecular Staging of Pancreatic Cancer Using Methylated DNA Markers in Peritoneal Lavage Fluid.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOccult intra-abdominal metastases are identified in approximately 20% of patients with radiographically localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) through staging laparoscopy, as peritoneal cytology is limited in sensitivity. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for PDAC in tumor tissue, blood, and pancreatic secretions. This study assesses the feasibility and diagnostic performance of MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid collected during staging laparoscopy, comparing their performance to mutant KRAS (mKRAS) detection.
methodsDNA from peritoneal lavage fluid of PDAC patients was analyzed for mKRAS mutations (codons 12, 13, and 61) using droplet-digital PCR and for 13 MDMs and a reference gene (B3GALT6) using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. An MDM score was generated from the average signal of the 13 MDMs and evaluated for its ability to detect intra-abdominal metastases via receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsAmong 48 patients, 15 (31%) had intra-abdominal metastases. The MDM score showed 87% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.98), outperforming mKRAS, which showed 40% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.62; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsMDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid may enable highly accurate molecular staging of PDAC and warrant validation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.