ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Guselkumab Safety in Patients With Latent Tuberculosis: Analysis of 11 Studies in Psoriatic Disease.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Certain psoriatic disease treatments, including tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi), increase tuberculosis (TB) risk. Testing for latent TB infection (LTBI) before initiating systemic therapy has been standard practice for psoriasis (PsO) patients; however, updated consensus states routine testing is not required before initiating interleukin (IL)-17 or IL-23 inhibitors. This analysis reports safety outcomes in LTBI+ patients with moderate-to-severe PsO or active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received guselkumab for up to 5 years. Data were pooled from 11 phase 2/3 studies (7 PsO, 4 PsA). Guselkumab 100 mg was generally administered at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (PsO studies) or every 4 or 8 weeks (PsA studies). Placebo-randomized patients crossed over to guselkumab at Week 16 and Week 24 in PsO and PsA studies, respectively. Patients with active TB or a history of active TB were excluded. LTBI+ patients could participate if LTBI treatment was initiated before/with the first dose of study drug or if LTBI treatment was completed within 5 years before the first dose of study drug. Among 5 255 randomized patients, 374 (7.1%) had LTBI and received preventive treatment, most commonly isoniazid (82.1%) and rifampicin (11.8%). No new-onset TB or LTBI reactivation occurred in any guselkumab-treated patient. Through Year 1, liver transaminase elevations were more common in LTBI+ vs. LTBI- patients; ≤ 2% of LTBI+ patients had CTCAE Grade 3 elevations vs. 0.5% of LTBI- patients (no LTBI+ patients had Grade 4 elevations). From Year 1-5 (after ~98% of LTBI+ patients completed preventive treatment), transaminase elevations were generally similar among LTBI+ and LTBI- patients. The absence of observed TB risk in guselkumab-treated patients suggests IL-23 inhibitors may be better treatment options than TNFi in high-risk patients, including those in TB-endemic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.