Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226301›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2026

Household firearm access, storage, perceptions, and discussions among U.S. military veterans: population-based estimates from the 2022 ASCEND survey.

Lindsey L Monteith, Joseph A Simonetti, Julie A Kittel, Ryan Holliday, Sean M Barnes, Evan R Polzer, Claire A Hoffmire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindsey L MonteithSpark M. Matsunaga VA Medical Center, VA Pacific Islands Healthcare System, 459 Patterson Rd, Honolulu, HI, 96819, United States of America. Lindsey.Monteith@va.gov.
Joseph A SimonettiFirearm Injury Prevention Initiative, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Julie A KittelDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Ryan HollidaySpark M. Matsunaga VA Medical Center, VA Pacific Islands Healthcare System, 459 Patterson Rd, Honolulu, HI, 96819, United States of America.
Sean M BarnesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Evan R PolzerVA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Claire A HoffmireDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirearm injury remains the leading method of suicide among U.S. veterans. Knowledge of the prevalence of firearm access, storage, and beliefs about firearms and suicide risk among veterans is necessary to inform firearm-related suicide prevention initiatives.

methodsA 2022 population-based survey of veterans (ASCEND), with responses weighted to the veteran population.

resultsIn 2022, 57.4% (95% CI: 56.4-58.4) of veterans had access to firearms in their home; of those, 53.7% (95% CI: 52.3-55.1) stored at least some household firearms unlocked and 49.0% (95% CI: 47.6-50.4) stored at least some firearms loaded with ammunition. The most common reason for having household firearms was protection against people (74.3%; 95% CI: 73.2-75.3). The majority of veterans reported agreement with beliefs regarding firearm access impacting suicide risk (e.g., that having a firearm in the home increases risk; 55.2%-71.0%) and indicated willingness to alter their access if thinking about suicide (74.9%-84.6%). Veterans reported the most willingness to discuss firearms with a family member (88.4% willing; 95% CI: 87.7-89.1), compared to friends (84.0%; 95% CI: 83.1-84.7) or providers (72.4%; 95% CI: 71.4-73.4). Although most were willing to discuss firearms with a primary care or mental health provider, only 12.9% (95% CI: 12.1-13.6) indicated that a healthcare provider had ever asked them about their firearm access. Firearm risk perceptions, willingness to change firearm access and discuss firearms, and prior discussions with a healthcare provider differed based on household firearm access responses: those who declined to respond (7.7%; 95% CI: 7.2-8.4) reported the least agreement with firearm risk statements (34.4%-57.7%) and the least willingness to change firearm access (54.5%-73.6%) or discuss firearms with others (75.5% family; 69.0% friends), particularly healthcare providers (35.0%; 95% CI: 31.1-39.0).

conclusionsMore than half of veterans have access to firearms in their home, an important risk factor for suicide. Results suggest a preference to include family in firearm suicide prevention efforts and a need to increase provider firearm discussions in healthcare settings. Additionally, as veterans who decline to respond to firearm access questions appear to differ in their firearm risk perceptions and willingness to reduce firearm access when risk is elevated, better understanding these veterans is essential.

Indexed as

FirearmLethal means safetyStorageVeteran

Identifiers

PMID42226301
PMCPMC13436288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.