Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226293›Full record

ArticleGenomics & informatics2026

Precision Medicine Gene Network Analyser: part I-cancer driver gene identification through network topology and ensemble machine learning.

Rashmi Siddalingappa, Showket Hussain, Deepa S, Pradeep Dheerendra, Shivanand Gornale, Muralidhara B L, Gugan Kothandan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics & informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rashmi SiddalingappaDepartment of Computer and Data Science, York St John University, London, UK. r.siddalingappa@yorksj.ac.uk.
Showket HussainDivision of Molecular Diagnostics & Mol Oncology, ICMR, New Delhi, India.
Deepa SDepartment of Computer Science, Christ University, Bangalore, India.
Pradeep DheerendraSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Shivanand GornaleDepartment of Computer Science, Rani Channamma University, Gulbarga, India.
Muralidhara B LDepartment of Computer Science and Applications, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India.
Gugan KothandanBiopolymer Modelling and Protein Chemistry Laboratory, University of Madras, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrecision oncology depends on identifying cancer driver genes and linking them to targeted therapies. Current methods using curated gene sets or generic classifiers often miss biologically relevant patterns in complex gene interaction networks.

methodsWe developed the Precision Medicine Gene Network Analyser, integrating network topology analysis with machine learning for cancer gene identification. The dataset included 699 cancer driver genes (COSMIC Cancer Gene Census) and 15,050 background genes, mapped to high-confidence protein-protein interaction networks from STRING (456,300 edges, 15,749 nodes). Network features such as degree, betweenness, PageRank, k-core, and clustering coefficients were extracted. Imbalance Aware Network Integrator (IANI) was proposed to address class imbalance, where balanced resampling and ensemble models (logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting) were combined with deep neural networks using focal loss, optimising thresholds for maximum F1-score. Hub genes were defined using a statistical cutoff of mean outdegree + 2 × SD (standard deviation).

resultsOn a test set of 3150 samples (140 cancer, 3010 non-cancer genes), the optimised ensemble improved ROC-AUC from 0.84 to 0.96, precision from 0.78 to 0.90, and recall from 0.42 to 0.81 (F1 = 0.85) at a threshold of 0.466. Hub analysis identified 689 hubs with fourfold enrichment of cancer genes (16.1% vs. 4.4%, p < 10

conclusionIntegrating protein interaction topology with imbalance-aware machine learning achieved 96% discrimination accuracy. This work forms a base for the upcoming phases of drug-gene mapping and patient-specific therapy prediction within the Precision Medicine Gene Network Analyser.

Indexed as

Cancer driver genesEnsemble machine learningHub gene analysisNetwork topologyPrecision oncologyProtein–protein interaction networks

Identifiers

PMID42226293
PMCPMC13227877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.