ArticleThrombosis journal2026
Re-administration of thrombolytics in massive pulmonary embolism with initial therapy failure: a case report.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMassive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening emergency with high mortality. Systemic thrombolysis is the standard reperfusion therapy for patients with hemodynamic instability. However, when initial thrombolysis fails, therapeutic options are limited and evidence supporting subsequent interventions is scarce. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 45-year-old man with hyperlipidemia and depression who presented with dyspnea, hypoxemia, and cardiogenic shock. Echocardiography revealed right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, consistent with massive PE. Initial therapy with full-dose alteplase (100 mg) and anticoagulation achieved only transient hemodynamic stabilization. The patient remained severely hypoxemic with persistent right ventricle (RV) dysfunction. As catheter-directed therapy and surgical embolectomy were unavailable, repeat systemic thrombolysis was pursued. A second full dose of alteplase (100 mg) was administered on hospital day four. Within 24 h, oxygen saturation improved from 65% to 92% on room air, and echocardiography confirmed substantial recovery of RV size and function. No major bleeding or other complications occurred during hospitalization.
conclusionCurrent guidelines do not recommend repeat thrombolysis for massive PE unresponsive to initial fibrinolysis, and available evidence is confined to case reports. This case demonstrates that, in carefully selected patients without contraindications, repeat systemic thrombolysis may represent a feasible and potentially lifesaving rescue option, particularly in resource-limited settings where other reperfusion strategies are not available. Further studies are needed to define safety, patient selection, and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.