Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226261›Full record

ReviewBiomarker research2026

Unraveling the immune microenvironment in primary CNS lymphoma.

Sven Lorenzen, Vanja Zeremski, Mirjeta Berisha, Dimitrios Mougiakakos, Tobias R Haage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sven LorenzenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Cell Therapy, and Radiation Therapy, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Vanja ZeremskiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Cell Therapy, and Radiation Therapy, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Mirjeta BerishaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Cell Therapy, and Radiation Therapy, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Dimitrios MougiakakosDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Cell Therapy, and Radiation Therapy, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Tobias R HaageDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Cell Therapy, and Radiation Therapy, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. tobias.haage@med.ovgu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare malignant lymphoid condition that arises within the central nervous system, which is considered an immune-privileged site. Outcomes for patients with PCNSL have substantially improved over the past decade, largely due to treatment intensification. In recent years, it has become increasingly evident that the biology of PCNSL is not solely determined by the tumor itself, but also by its close and complex interaction with the immune microenvironment. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and dendritic cells, in particular, reshape the immune milieu in PCNSL. Notably, an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by a high concentration of M2-like macrophages, a low concentration of CD8+ T-cells, and high expression of the cytokine IL-10 is associated with an unfavorable survival. Conversely, T-cell immunity and its abundance are pivotal for favorable treatment outcomes, highlighting the prognostic importance of immune competence within the central nervous system. The current standard of care for induction treatment is based on high-dose methotrexate as the central component, followed by consolidating high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. Long-term follow-up data from the IELSG32 and PRECISE trials demonstrated that up to 70% of patients remained alive at seven years, underscoring the curative potential of these strategies. Eligibility mainly depends on performance status, which is recognized as a key prognostic factor in standard risk stratifications. Nevertheless, relapse rates remain substantial, prompting growing interest in immunotherapeutic strategies. T-cell-based approaches, including among others checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell engagers, and CAR T-cells have achieved encouraging therapeutic success. However, the immune-privileged nature of the central nervous system poses immunological challenges that limit immune surveillance and facilitate tumor cell evasion, creating therapeutic obstacles in PCNSL. A comprehensive understanding of the manner in which alterations in oncogenic signaling influence immune evasion strategies holds considerable potential for enhancing future therapeutic approaches in PCNSL. Despite compelling evidence that the immune microenvironment significantly influences disease progression, established prognostic models for PCNSL do not yet consider inflammatory or immunological biomarkers. Given the significant prognostic and therapeutic implications of the immune microenvironment, its impact should be reflected and validated in future standard risk stratifications. Integrating validated immune biomarkers with emerging immunotherapeutic strategies has the potential not only to improve individual patient outcomes but also to optimize the overall structure of care for patients with PCNSL.

Indexed as

Immune evasionImmune microenvironmentImmunotherapyPrimary CNS lymphomaPrognostic scoringT-cell immunity

Identifiers

PMID42226261
PMCPMC13227751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.