ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2026
Narrative medicine intervention for mental wellbeing in Juvenile Myositis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have increased rates of anxiety and depression (15-65%) when compared to healthy children. Narrative medicine, a group-based intervention that allows patients to reflect on medical experiences, improves patient-reported outcomes with reduces depression rates in adults. Given limited data in pediatric rheumatology, this study assesses feasibility of a patient-targeted narrative medicine intervention and its impact on mental health burden in JDM and JIA.
methodsWe prospectively recruited patients ages 6 to 21 with JDM and JIA for a narrative medicine intervention. Participants were divided by diagnosis and age into four narrative medicine groups, with six sessions held over 3 months. Demographic and medical information were collected by chart review. Patients completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires including Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Childhood Attitude Towards Illness Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and CoVID Stress Scale.
resultsTwelve patients with JDM (67% female) and nine with JIA (78% female) participated in the narrative medicine intervention. All patients participated in at least 50% of sessions and 91% participated in at least four of the six sessions. Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-intervention questionnaires for any scales. Sub-analysis of those with elevated GAD-7 and PHQ-8 pre-intervention showed a trend towards improvement in anxiety (p=0.057) and no change for depression (p=0.171).
conclusionNinety-one percent participated in at least four of the six sessions, demonstrating feasibility. This exploratory study showed trend toward improved anxiety following narrative medicine session participation for those with elevated GAD-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.