Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226201›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2026

Exploitation or economic prosperity: corporate activities and Aboriginal self-determination in media discourse.

Jacob Cubis, Cassandra J C Wright, Clement Bresson, Teegan Wattam, Royce Ramsamy, Beau Cubillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob CubisMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Building 58, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, Tiwi, NT, Australia. Jacob.cubis@menzies.edu.au.
Cassandra J C WrightMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Building 58, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, Tiwi, NT, Australia.
Clement BressonMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Building 58, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, Tiwi, NT, Australia.
Teegan WattamMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Building 58, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, Tiwi, NT, Australia.
Royce RamsamyMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Building 58, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, Tiwi, NT, Australia.
Beau CubilloMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Building 58, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, Tiwi, NT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe political and regulatory environment in which people live can have profound impacts on health and wellbeing through practices that prioritise commercial development and interest over public health. For Aboriginal People, this is further undermined through corporate influence over Aboriginal autonomy, political and social participation, cultural preservation, economic and land control and, free prior and informed consent and decision-making capacity over their interests, referred to as self-determination.

methodsThis study applies a content analysis to understand the intersection of this issue within media discourse focused on the Northern Territory of Australia. Articles were located through Factiva and Newsbank searches targeting commercial activities from the extractive resource, alcohol, and food industries that impact Aboriginal People and/or Communities from 2015 to 2025.

resultsOne hundred and sixty-one articles were included in the analysis. The dominant narrative identified in the media articles focused on the economic contributions commercial development provided to Aboriginal Peoples (more commonly found in commercial news outlets and trade magazines), while a prominent counter-narrative focused on harm to Country and failures to consult Traditional Owners (more common in articles by the public broadcaster and Indigenous-owned media). Our findings challenge the notion of a single-victim narrative by illustrating how multiple stakeholders (i.e. industry, government, media, and at times civil society) collectively influence public discourse, which can either hinder or promote self-determination. Further, centring self-determination requires a suspension of assumptions about what is best for Aboriginal Peoples.

Indexed as

CommerceMass MediaPersonal AutonomyHumansNorthern TerritoryAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander HealthAustralian mediaCommercial determinants of healthCorporate political activities

Identifiers

PMID42226201
PMCPMC13344025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.