Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226192›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2026

Evolution of treatment and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a comparative analysis across two decades at a tertiary center.

Caio Vinícius Suartz, Maria Fernanda Dias Azevedo, Pedro Henrique Souza Brito, Débora Narumi Demitrol Setoue, Caio Mazzoneto Teófilo de Moraes, Pedro Vasconcelos Henry Sant'Anna, Luiz Guilherme Pereira da Silva, Leonam Bringhenti Schumacher, Victor Vion Sant Galvez, Maurício Cordeiro Dener and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Caio Vinícius SuartzNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Urology, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. caio.v_suartz@hotmail.com.
Maria Fernanda Dias AzevedoAlbert Einstein Faculty of Health Sciences, Medicine, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique Souza BritoUniversity City of São Paulo, Medicine, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora Narumi Demitrol SetoueHospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Mazzoneto Teófilo de MoraesHospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Vasconcelos Henry Sant'AnnaHospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Guilherme Pereira da SilvaHospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonam Bringhenti SchumacherFederal University of Paraná, Medicine, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Victor Vion Sant GalvezSão Camilo University Center, Medicine, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maurício Cordeiro DenerCancer Institute of the State of São Paulo (ICESP), Urology, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
William Carlos NahasCancer Institute of the State of São Paulo (ICESP), Urology, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-FilhoCancer Institute of the State of São Paulo (ICESP), Urology, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last two decades, significant advances in the perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, such as enhanced recovery protocols, increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, improved care pathways, and stronger multidisciplinary collaboration, have reshaped surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of care and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy at a Brazilian tertiary cancer center over 20 years.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical, surgical, and pathological data from patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy between January 2005 and April 2025. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to the year of surgery (2005-2014 vs. 2015-2025). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to compare overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival between periods.

resultsA total of 733 patients were included (mean age, 66.2 years; 69.2% male). An age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 was present in 90.4%, and preoperative hydronephrosis in 41.5%. Locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) occurred in 50.9%, lymph node positivity (pN+) in 26.6%, and 34.5% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Early complications (< 30 days) occurred in 51.2%, early reoperation in 19.3%, and late complications (30-90 days) in 24.0%, with 33.3% classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III. On multivariable Cox regression, treatment period remained independently associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.029). Clinical stage was also independently associated with overall survival (overall p = 0.046), with advanced stage increasing the hazard of death (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.08-2.02; p = 0.015). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly improved overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival in 2015-2025 versus 2005-2014 (all log-rank p < 0.001).

conclusionImproved survival after radical cystectomy over the last decade reflects advances in perioperative care in the management of bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Indexed as

CystectomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBladder cancerEpidemiologyPerioperative therapyRadical Cystectomy

Identifiers

PMID42226192
PMCPMC13445874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.