ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Treatment variability among low-acuity EMS patients in a university hospital ED: a retrospective registry study from Southwest Finland.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency medical services (EMS) increasingly convey patients with non-urgent conditions to emergency departments (EDs), contributing to pressure on acute care systems. In many settings, patients classified as low-acuity in the prehospital phase represent a substantial proportion of ED arrivals. This study examined characteristics and ED management patterns among low-acuity EMS conveyances to a university hospital ED in Southwest Finland.
methodsThis retrospective registry-based cohort study used linked EMS and hospital data from May 2019 to December 2023. Low-acuity patients were defined as missions with a final urgency category D after on-scene EMS reassessment. In total, 34,898 category D conveyances to the university hospital ED were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses focused on the four most common conveyance categories-decrease in common general condition, fall, patient transport, and mental disorder-comprising 21,048 complete-case missions. Outcomes included laboratory testing, imaging, medication administration, and inpatient admission. Associations with age (≥70 vs <70 years), sex, night-time (vs daytime), and weekend (vs weekday) were examined.
resultsOlder age was associated with higher odds of diagnostic testing in several conveyance categories. The largest age-related odds ratios were observed in mental disorder conveyances, in which age ≥70 years was associated with higher odds of imaging (odds ratio [OR] 5.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.68; 6.79) and laboratory testing (OR 4.62, 95% CI 3.59; 6.00). Night-time conveyance was associated with lower odds of medication administration across all four conveyance categories and with lower odds of imaging in three categories. In the decrease in common general condition subgroup, night-time conveyance was associated with lower odds of laboratory testing (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30; 0.56). In the patient transport subgroup, night-time conveyance was associated with higher odds of inpatient admission (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27; 1.74). Associations with sex and weekend conveyance varied across categories.
conclusionsED management of low-acuity EMS patients varies by age, sex, time of conveyance, and conveyance category. These findings suggest that downstream hospital care for low-acuity EMS patients is shaped not only by patient characteristics but also by temporal and organizational factors. Linked prehospital and hospital registry data can provide system-level evidence to support the development of more appropriate acute care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.