ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
In silico generation of gene expression profiles using diffusion models.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning inherent genetic patterns and trait associations with deep generative models for discrete genotype simulation.GigaScience · 2026Article
- GEMDiff: a diffusion workflow bridges between normal and tumor gene expression states: a breast cancer case study.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA-seq data is used for precision medicine (e.g., cancer predictions), which benefits from deep learning approaches to analyze complex gene expression data. However, transcriptomics datasets often have few samples compared to deep learning standards. Synthetic data generation is thus being explored to address this data scarcity. So far, only deep generative models such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been used for this aim. Considering the recent success of diffusion models (DM) in image generation, we propose a diffusion-model-based generation pipeline that leverages the power of such generative models on transcriptomics data.
resultsThis paper presents two state-of-the-art diffusion models (DDPM and DDIM) and achieves their adaptation in the transcriptomics field. DM-generated data of L1000 landmark genes show better predictive performance over TCGA and GTEx datasets. We also compare linear and nonlinear reconstruction methods to recover the complete transcriptome. Results show that such reconstruction methods can boost the performance of diffusion models, as well as VAEs and GANs.
conclusionsOverall, the extensive comparison of various generative models using data quality indicators shows that diffusion models rank among the best-performing methods, making them promising synthetic transcriptomics generators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.