Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226153›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

In silico generation of gene expression profiles using diffusion models.

Alice Lacan, Romain André, Michèle Sebag, Blaise Hanczar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice LacanIBISC, University Paris-Saclay (Univ. Evry), Évry-Courcouronnes, France. alice.b.lacan@gmail.com.
Romain AndréDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Michèle SebagTAU, LISN-Inria-CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Blaise HanczarIBISC, University Paris-Saclay (Univ. Evry), Évry-Courcouronnes, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-THIA-0013-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA-seq data is used for precision medicine (e.g., cancer predictions), which benefits from deep learning approaches to analyze complex gene expression data. However, transcriptomics datasets often have few samples compared to deep learning standards. Synthetic data generation is thus being explored to address this data scarcity. So far, only deep generative models such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been used for this aim. Considering the recent success of diffusion models (DM) in image generation, we propose a diffusion-model-based generation pipeline that leverages the power of such generative models on transcriptomics data.

resultsThis paper presents two state-of-the-art diffusion models (DDPM and DDIM) and achieves their adaptation in the transcriptomics field. DM-generated data of L1000 landmark genes show better predictive performance over TCGA and GTEx datasets. We also compare linear and nonlinear reconstruction methods to recover the complete transcriptome. Results show that such reconstruction methods can boost the performance of diffusion models, as well as VAEs and GANs.

conclusionsOverall, the extensive comparison of various generative models using data quality indicators shows that diffusion models rank among the best-performing methods, making them promising synthetic transcriptomics generators.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAutoencoderComputer SimulationDeep LearningGenerative Adversarial NetworksGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansDeep generative modelsDiffusionPrecision medicineTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42226153
PMCPMC13418420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.