ArticleBMC public health2026
Predicting adolescent suicidal tendency in Chinese secondary school students: a machine learning approach with XGBoost and SHAP interpretation.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent suicide is a critical public health issue globally. Early detection of suicidal tendency remains challenging due to its concealed and multidimensional nature. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model to predict suicidal tendency among Chinese secondary school students.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 12,063 students from Suzhou, China. A total of 23 variables, including demographic, psychological, and behavioral factors, were collected. Seven machine learning models (LR + LASSO, LightGBM, SVM, KNN, DT, RF, and XGBoost) were developed and compared using fivefold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Feature importance was interpreted using SHAP values.
resultsAmong the participants, 21.98% exhibited suicidal tendency. XGBoost outperformed other models on the validation set, achieving an AUC of 0.802 (95% CI: 0.785-0.818), sensitivity of 0.686, specificity of 0.758, and a negative predictive value of 0.892. The top three predictors were depressed mood (PHQ2), self-dissatisfaction (PHQ6), and reluctance to seek help. SHAP analysis revealed that male students with high distress and low help-seeking intent constituted a high-risk subgroup.
conclusionThe XGBoost-based model demonstrates strong predictive ability and clinical interpretability for identifying adolescents at risk of suicide. It highlights the importance of integrating psychological and behavioral factors in school-based screening programs, particularly for under-recognized subgroups such as distressed males who avoid seeking help.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.