SynthesisJournal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT2026
Efficacy of Physical Modalities for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain After Stroke: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeHemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) represents a common and disabling complication following stroke, which has multiple causes and important functional consequences. Physical modalities are frequently used to manage HSP, but evidence on their effectiveness remains inconsistent. Our aim is to systematically review the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of physical modalities, compared with sham or standard care, for improving pain and function in adults with poststroke HSP.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We included RCTs assessing physical modalities versus sham or standard therapy in adult stroke survivors with HSP. The primary outcome was pain reduction; secondary outcomes included functional mobility, quality of life, and adverse events. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) up to July 30, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.
resultsTwelve RCTs involving 567 participants were included. Interventions comprised electrotherapy (n = 6), shock wave therapy (n = 3), and laser therapy (n = 3). Most studies showed significant pain reduction compared with control. Electrotherapy provided sustained analgesia; extracorporeal shock wave therapy improved structural abnormalities and pain; laser therapy enhanced both pain and functional outcomes. Adverse events were mostly mild. However, safety conclusions are limited by incomplete and inconsistent adverse event reporting. Heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsBased on low to very low certainty evidence, physical modalities may offer benefit for HSP, but uncertainty remains regarding both long-term effectiveness and safety. Integration into multimodal rehabilitation protocols may be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.