ArticleBMC global and public health2026
Coordinated outcome-wide analytic methodology for multi-wave analyses of the global flourishing study.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cohort update: waves 2 and 3 of the global flourishing study.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal associations of dispositional forgivingness with multidimensional well-being: a two-wave outcome-wide analysis in the Global Flourishing Study.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this article, we describe the analytic design of the coordinated set of outcome-wide analyses used for examining longitudinal associations using data from the Global Flourishing Study (GFS), involving a multinational and multidisciplinary group of scholars. We discuss the benefits of outcome-wide analyses and provide details on controlling for high-dimensional confounders using principal components, accounting for complex sampling designs, imputing missing data, conducting sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding, meta-analyzing estimates of associations from across countries, and reporting results. We provide a brief illustrative example of the outcome-wide approach by estimating the association of Wave 1 sense of mastery with a wide range of Wave 2 outcomes. The example illustrates how results can be sensitive to analytic decisions, such as different coding strategies for the predictor and the number of principal components included. We conclude by outlining the major strengths and limitations of the employed methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.