Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226009›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Breed-specific enteric methane emission factor assessment in Italian dairy cattle leveraging DHI and primary ration data.

Giulia Ferronato, Mesfin Mekonnen Moliso, Raphael Mrode, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan, Riccardo Negrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia FerronatoDepartment of Civil, Environmental, Architectural, Engineering and Mathematics (DICATAM), Università degli Studi di Brescia, 25121, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-8540
Mesfin Mekonnen MolisoDepartment of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122, Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9630-1136
Raphael MrodeScotland's Rural College, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1964-5653
Paolo Ajmone-MarsanDepartment of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122, Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3165-4579
Riccardo NegriniDepartment of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122, Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8735-0286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from dairy cattle are a major contributor to greenhouse gas footprint in the livestock sector. This study applied Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 2 equations to estimate enteric methane emissions in Italian Holstein, Brown Swiss, and Red Pied herds using either default dietary assumptions or farm-specific diet information. By combining individual Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) test-day records with primary ration data, the analysis examined how improved input data resolution affected methane estimates across breeds and animal categories under commercial farming conditions. Data were collected from 138 Italian dairy farms participating in the national Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) program between January 2021 and December 2022, with farm rations recorded concurrently during DHI test days by trained technicians using a standardized questionnaire. Breed, emission estimation approach, and their interaction were analyzed using aligned rank transform (ART) procedures with permutation-based P-values. Holstein cows exhibited greater daily methane production (MeP = 443.60 ± 5.68 g/d; P < 0.001), whereas Red Pied herds showed the greatest methane intensity (MeI = 29.99 ± 0.70 g/kg fat- and protein-corrected milk; P < 0.001). Breed and CH4 estimation approaches affected emission estimates, however, their interaction was not significant, indicating consistent breed rankings across methods. Post hoc analyses revealed no significant differences in methane indices among breeds. Incorporation of farm-specific ration data impacted emission estimates, particularly for nonproductive groups such as dry cows and heifers, highlighting the importance of context-specific dietary inputs for improving the accuracy and representativeness of CH4 inventories.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietMethaneAnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleItalySpecies SpecificityMethanedairy cowenteric methanefeeding strategyIPCC

Identifiers

PMID42226009
PMCPMC13341014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.