ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Development and use of a Porcine Liver Model (PLM) for robotic liver surgery training.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEx-vivo models may be useful in shortening the learning curve and increasing proficiency in robotic surgery. Our team developed an ex-vivo Porcine Liver Model (PLM) for Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) robotic surgery training we aimed to validate it.
designThe model was used in a robotic HPB surgery course. A Likert scale survey was administered to participants, investigating reliability, face validity, content validity and operator confidence.
results25 surgeons responded to the survey: 11 residents (median training 4 years), 14 consultants (median practice 5 years). The PLM was used on a step-by-step chain of exercises including cholecystectomy, hepatic hilum dissection, liver mobilization, transection and hepato-jejunal anastomosis. The model was costless and easy to prepare. The average results on the survey were above 4 for reliability, face validity and content validity (4.3, 4.2, 4.5 respectively) and 3.9 for operator confidence; The model scored better among residents, in particular in terms of reliability (4.5 vs 4.1, p=0.05) and face validity (4.4 vs 3.9, p=0.03).
conclusionsWe developed an ex-vivo liver model that may be a valuable tool for robotic surgery training in HPB. This is particularly useful for surgeons with no prior experience with the Da Vinci platform or with minimally invasive liver surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.