Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225959›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026

Predictors of penile prosthesis length: results from the PHOENIX registry.

Koenraad Van Renterghem, Alvaro Yebes, Glenn Lamers, Josep Torremadé, Carlo Bettocchi, Borja Garcia-Gomez, Wai Gin Lee, Christien Caris, Wim Witjes, Ignacio Moncada and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03849586 (Prospective Registry for Patients Undergoing Penile Prosthesis Implantation for Male Erectile Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03849586 active not recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Registry for Patients Undergoing Penile Prosthesis Implantation for Male Erectile Dysfunction

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorEuropean Association of Urology Research FoundationRan2021 to 2032Enrolled1,076ConditionsErectile Dysfunction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Koenraad Van Renterghem *Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-6651
Alvaro Yebes *Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. alvarojavier.yebes@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4246-8184
Glenn LamersJessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-8046
Josep TorremadéHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlo BettocchiAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti" di Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-3005
Borja Garcia-GomezHospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-3656
Wai Gin LeeUniversity College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-5364
Christien CarisEAU Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-2553
Wim WitjesEAU Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-7920
Ignacio MoncadaHospital Universitario La Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain.
David RalphUniversity College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
EAU Research Foundation PHOENIX Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) is an effective treatment for refractory erectile dysfunction (ED), but changes in penile length after surgery remain a major determinant of patient satisfaction. We aimed to identify patient- and surgery-related factors associated with final penile length, measured as total implanted device length. We analysed prospectively collected data from the PHOENIX registry, a multicenter cohort including consecutive PPI cases from 29 centers between November 2021 and August 2024 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03849586). Baseline demographics and surgical variables were recorded. Variables significant at p < 0.05 in univariate analysis and clinically relevant covariates were entered into a multivariate linear regression model. After exclusions, 1033 patients were included (mean age 60.9 ± 9.06 years). Mean total device length was 20.0 ± 2.36 cm (range 6-28). In multivariate analysis, shorter total device length was independently associated with diabetes mellitus (adjusted coefficient -0.59 cm; 95% CI -0.97 to -0.22; p = 0.002), history of radical prostatectomy (-0.45 cm; 95% CI -1.01 to -0.11; p = 0.04), prior pelvic radiotherapy (-1.42 cm; 95% CI -2.42 to -0.51; p = 0.002), Peyronie's disease (-0.83 cm; 95% CI -1.32 to -0.34; p < 0.001), previous intracavernosal injections (-0.68 cm; 95% CI -0.99 to -0.37; p < 0.001). Avoidance of sequential corporal dilation was associated with a modest increase in device length (+0.15 cm; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.50; p = 0.04). Loss of penile length is a well-established cause of patient and partner dissatisfaction following PPI. Pre-operative counselling and management of expectations is critical to the success of the procedure. In this large prospective multicenter cohort different factors were found to be associated with greater or lesser length. Among them, and following multivariate analysis, diabetes, radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, Peyronie's disease and prior intracavernosal injections were associated with shorter implanted device length, whereas no corporal dilation was associated with longer device length. These findings can inform preoperative counselling and surgical planning.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.