ArticleScientific reports2026
An experimental study on the effects of different strength training methods on smash performance and scoring in adolescent badminton players.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of ballistic training (BT), blood flow restriction training (BFRT), and traditional resistance training (TRT) on the smash performance of adolescent badminton players. Thirty athletes were randomly assigned to BT, BFRT, or TRT groups and completed 12 training sessions over four weeks. Heart rate (HR) was continuously monitored to adjust intensity and rest intervals. After the intervention, data were analyzed using two-way mixed-design ANOVA. Smash speed significantly improved across all groups (F(1,27) = 22.34, p < 0.05, η²ₚ = 0.66), with a significant time by group interaction (F(2,27) = 6.71, p = 0.004, η²ₚ = 0.33). In the BFRT group, smash speed increased from 166.8 ± 9.7 to 202.0 ± 11.3 km·h⁻¹. Smash accuracy improved slightly without significant group differences (F(2,27) = 4.23, p = 0.026, η²ₚ = 0.24). Exercise heart rate and recovery showed significant time and time by group effects (Ex HR: F(2,27) = 7.08, p = 0.003; HRR: F(2,27) = 5.42, p = 0.010), while resting HR remained stable. In conclusion, both BT and BFRT increase smash speed in adolescent badminton players, suggesting that combining these methods can improve performance and training efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.