ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants after the food and drug administration warning actions.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Evidence, Controversies, and the Future of Biotics in the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate changes in probiotic use and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants following the 2023 FDA actions. STUDY
designNatural experiment observational study of preterm infants from the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse comparing NEC among infants in high probiotic-use (HUC) centers versus low-use centers (LUC) using difference-in-differences analyses from October 2022-September 2023 to April 2024-March 2025.
resultsThere were 2785 infants in the HUCs and 7298 infants in the LUCs. After FDA action, probiotic use decreased in HUCs (86-6.9%); the decrease was smaller in LUCs (13-0.1%). NEC incidence increased in HUCs (2.7-4.4%), but remained unchanged in LUCs at 3.6% (adjusted difference-in-difference in NEC in HUCs compared to LUCs: 1.18%; 95% CI 0.03-2.33%, P = 0.045).
conclusionNEC incidence increased in centers routinely using probiotics after rapid cessation of use following FDA actions.
Identifiers
42225922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.