ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-modal data fusion and deep reinforcement learning for dynamic resource scheduling in intelligent manufacturing systems under variable market demand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As intelligent manufacturing systems increasingly pursue mass customization and rapid market responsiveness, efficient resource allocation has become a critical determinant of production competitiveness. Dynamic resource scheduling in such systems involves complex challenges stemming from highly variable market demand and complex production conditions. This study extends a multi-modal data fusion approach that incorporates deep learning methods to solve dynamic resource scheduling with variable demand scenarios. The approach involves the fusion of sensor, production, and market data using intermediate fusion methods, the adoption of an LSTM with attention model to predict demand, and Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) methods to control resource scheduling decisions. Simulation outcomes show that the system achieves 82.6% resource utilization and 89.1% on-time delivery performance in nominal scenarios; however, it performs poorly during peak hours, leading to severe delays accounting for 12.8% of total deliveries. The multi-modal fusion approach outperforms single-source methods by 9.6% in prediction accuracy but exhibits limitations in cross-industry generalization (67.9% efficiency retention) and computational efficiency (18-35 min for large-scale scenarios). These findings provide realistic insights into the practical deployment of AI-driven scheduling systems in manufacturing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.