ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Evaluating the Clinical and Humanistic Impact of a Self-Care and Minor Ailment Service (MAS).
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinor ailments contribute significantly to the burden on healthcare systems. The introduction of a Minor Ailment Service (MAS) may alleviate pressure from hospital Accident & Emergency departments by directing patients suffering from minor ailments to be managed within the community. Although MAS has demonstrated positive results internationally, its effectiveness and acceptability in Hong Kong have not been evaluated. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the clinical and humanistic impacts of a MAS delivered by pharmacists at community pharmacies operated by non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in Hong Kong.
methodsSubjects were recruited using convenience sampling at eight NGO-operated community pharmacies. Patient-reported outcomes, including symptom resolution, satisfaction, and enablement, were collected using a follow-up questionnaire one week after MAS. Additionally, consultation records were matched and extracted from the Community Pharmacy Services System. Descriptive data analyses were conducted to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes after using MAS. Factors influencing the primary outcomes were assessed using mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models.
resultsThis study demonstrates that most subjects (95.1%) report improvement in their symptoms. The mean scores for the Pharmacy Services Questionnaire and Patient Enablement Instrument are 4.0 ± 0.8 out of 5 and 6.8 ± 3.2 out of 12, respectively. Minor ailments relating to the respiratory system are most frequently reported. Significant negative associations in symptom resolution, satisfaction, and enablement are mainly observed in patients suffering from central nervous system-related symptoms.
conclusionsPatients receiving MAS provided by community pharmacists in community pharmacies report high levels of symptom resolution, satisfaction and enablement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.