ArticleScientific reports2026
A deep learning approach for keratoconus detection using spatio-temporal features from corneal imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disease that requires early and accurate detection to prevent severe visual impairment. This study presents a deep learning-based classification model for distinguishing between healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic corneal imaging data from the CORVIS system. A hybrid CNN-RNN architecture was developed, combining a fine-tuned InceptionV3 network for spatial feature extraction with a recurrent LSTM module to capture temporal patterns across image sequences. To ensure robust evaluation, a 10-fold stratified cross-validation strategy was employed, with data splits performed at the patient level to avoid data leakage. The model achieved an average accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of approximately 0.90 across folds, demonstrating strong generalization performance. Boxplot visualizations of metric distributions further confirmed model stability and revealed minimal performance variance. Class-wise analysis showed high effectiveness in detecting both healthy and keratoconic cases, although slightly greater variability was observed in the classification of healthy eyes. These results indicate that the proposed method is a promising tool for keratoconus screening and may complement existing diagnostic workflows. Further validation on external datasets is recommended prior to clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.