ArticleScientific reports2026
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) modeling: in vitro validation and integration into patient-specific planning tool.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims at developing and experimentally validate a three-dimensional numerical model designed to predict acoustic propagation and thermal effects during High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) therapy, in order to support patient-specific treatment planning. A 3D time-domain simulation was implemented using the k-Wave toolbox, capturing both acoustic wave propagation and thermal effects. Validation was performed using five tissue-mimicking phantoms with distinct acoustic and thermal properties, each tested under three different HIFU exposure conditions. Lesion dimensions were assessed longitudinally and transversely in both simulations and experiments, and spatial concordance was quantified by evaluating the overlap between simulated and experimental lesions. Simulated longitudinal lesion extents fell within the interquartile range of experimental data in four out of nine phantom-condition combinations with a maximum absolute error of 3.14 mm while transverse dimensions in three out of nine with maximum absolute error equal to 4.16 mm. Spatial overlap between simulated and experimental lesions reached a maximum of 92%. Simulations on phantoms required approximately 4 min, while patient-specific cases completed in about 7 min, accurately capturing heterogeneous tissue characteristics and bone interfaces. In scenarios involving rib intersection, a 40% reduction in focal pressure was observed, leading to significant smaller lesions. The validated 3D simulation, integrated into a planning platform, reliably predicts HIFU ablation zones and focal shifts, showing strong agreement with experimental data and delivering results within clinically feasible times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.