Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225910›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-Strategy optimisation algorithm for multi-UAV path planning in complex mountainous environments.

Xinrong Zhang, Zhe Cheng, Zhicong Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinrong ZhangSchool of Automation, Huaian University, Huaian, 223003, China. nn33@163.com.
Zhe ChengSchool of Automation, Huaian University, Huaian, 223003, China.
Zhicong ZhengSchool of Automation, Huaian University, Huaian, 223003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a three-dimensional path planning method for UAV swarms using the Multi-Strategy Improved Crested Porcupine Optimizer (ICPO), designed to enable UAVs to more effectively avoid obstacles and optimize flight paths. This study integrates tent mapping with the reverse refraction learning strategy to enhance the diversity of the algorithm's population. Inspired by animal escape behavior, the first defense strategy is replaced with a moving escape strategy to expand the global search. The fourth defense strategy is improved using a Cauchy distribution, making the probability distribution independent of the global optimal solution, thereby rendering the search process independent and flexible while reducing computational complexity. To avoid getting stuck in local optima later in the process, a Cauchy-Gaussian mutation strategy was introduced, enabling the algorithm to better escape local optima. Simulations were conducted on the 2005 and 2022 test sets, and the results demonstrated that ICPO exhibits superior robustness and stability. In 3D terrain simulations, the ICPO algorithm proved its effectiveness in path planning.

Indexed as

3D path planningComplex environmentsImproved crested-porcupine optimization algorithmUAV path planningUAV technology

Identifiers

PMID42225910
PMCPMC13470455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.