ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of Muller maneuver on upper airway characteristics and surrounding structures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Muller maneuver (MM) collapses the upper airway and mimics apneic events during sleep. This study aimed to assess the effect of MM on the upper airway (UA) and surrounding structures of patients with OSA using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This prospective study of 18 moderate-to-severe OSA patients included two CBCT scans, one during gentle breathing and another while performing MM, with standardized head and neck positioning. UA, soft tissue, and hyoid bone were analyzed using linear, area, and volumetric measurements with OnDemand 3D software version 10.0.1 (1008 measurements). Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Marginal Homogeneity tests, and two-way repeated-measures ANOVA were performed using SPSS version 27 software. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. MM statistically significantly decreased the following airway parameters: minimum anterior-posterior (mAP) of nasopharynx (6.41% (P = 0.048)), mAP-oropharynx (38.81% (P = 0.006)), minimum transverse(mT) of oropharynx (38.88% (P = 0.006)), minimum cross-sectional area(mCSA) of oropharynx (42.02%; P = 0.011), volume(V) of oropharynx (27.41%; P = 0.002), mAP-hypopharynx (19.77%;P = 0.039) and mCSA-hypopharynx (11.77%;P = 0.048), V-UA (11.76%;P = 0.048) and minimum axial area (39.01%; P = 0.007). MM also resulted in significant vertical hyoid bone changes and soft tissue length (P = 0.001, P = 0.016, respectively). Effect size analysis demonstrated predominantly moderate-to-large effects across variables, particularly for hyoid bone displacement and oropharyngeal airway narrowing, indicating that the observed changes were not only statistically significant but also clinically meaningful. This noninvasive, low-cost approach, provides comprehensive evaluation of the UA and surrounding structures. It also offers functional insight by capturing airway configuration under negative pressure conditions, enabling a more dynamic assessment of airway behavior and collapsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.