ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning models for predicting postpartum convulsions using clinical indicators from PMA Ethiopia data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum convulsions, defined as seizure episodes occurring after childbirth during the postpartum period, remain a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in Ethiopia. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict postpartum convulsions using clinical indicators from performance monitoring for action (PMA) Ethiopia data set. Eight machine learning algorithms were developed and evaluated. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) approach was used for feature selection, and class imbalance was addressed using up-sampling techniques. The data were preprocessed and split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model interpretability was examined using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The neural network model achieved the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.868), followed by support vector machine (AUC = 0.833) and Random forest (AUC = 0.822). SHAP analysis identified migraine, convulsion, and abdominal pain during pregnancy as the most influential predictors, followed by timing of ANC visits, blood pressure, and urine testing, and lack of treatment for pregnancy-related complications. Machine learning models, particularly Neural Networks, showed promising performance in predicting postpartum convulsions using routinely collected clinical data. The use of explainable artificial intelligence may help identify women at higher risk and support timely clinical decision-making, potentially contributing to reduced maternal complications in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.