ArticleScientific reports2026
The difference between subjective symptoms and objective symptom of edema during the menstrual cycle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the differences between subjective and objective symptoms of edema during the menstrual cycle in female university students with regular menstruation. The study included 29 female university students with regular menstrual cycles. The menstrual cycle was categorized into the early follicular, mid-luteal, and late-luteal phases, and measurements were taken during each phase. Subjective symptoms were evaluated using body charts and the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) to assess the presence of edema. Objective symptoms were measured using a body composition analyzer to assess body weight, body water content, and regional water content. In the evaluation of subjective symptoms of edema using the body chart, no significant differences were observed across cycles. However, when body regions were compared, there were significantly fewer subjective symptoms in the upper arm (Rt/Lt) than in the face and trunk across all phases, while the lower leg (Rt/Lt) had significantly more subjective symptoms. The MDQ (water retention item) showed no marked differences across cycles. For objective evaluations of edema, including body weight and total body water, no significant differences were observed across cycles; however, regional water content was significantly higher in the trunk and right arm during the mid-luteal and late-luteal phases than in the early follicular phase. Our findings suggest that the location and timing of subjective edema symptoms may differ from those of objective symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.