ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid knowledge-based and evolutionary framework for fault diagnosis and optimization in power systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a hybrid artificial intelligence framework designed to improve the diagnosis of error and subsequent optimization of operational efficiency in complex energy systems. By integrating knowledge-based systems with evolutionary algorithms, we address the critical need for fast and accurate fault identification as a prerequisite for maintaining the reliability of the network. Knowledge-based components use expert rules to precisely determine the locations and types of errors, and then dynamically limit genetic algorithms (GAs) to optimize restoration strategies such as load reduction and network reconfiguration. Performance metrics reported in this study were obtained from multiple independent simulation trials conducted under varying fault locations and noise conditions. The proposed framework achieved higher fault-diagnosis accuracy with an average detection latency of less than 55.65 ms by performing comprehensive simulations of the IEEE 30-bus and 118-bus systems, across different test conditions. By intelligently reducing the search space, the hybrid approach reduces the total system recovery time to less than 1.0 s, a significant improvement over the independent evolutionary methods that require more than 5.0 s. In addition, the optimization module successfully limited load loss to less than 5%, surpassing traditional methods by more than 50% in terms of service continuity. Robustness analysis confirmed diagnostic accuracy of more than 98% even below the signal-to-noise ratio of 20 dB, and IEEE 118 bus scale-up test showed a 38% to 47% increase in computational efficiency compared to standalone particle swarm optimization (PSO). These results highlight the performance of the framework and the practical application of critical energy infrastructure management with real-time, resilient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.