ArticleScientific reports2026
Reliability of quantitative and qualitative chorioretinal uveitis lesion analysis on blue, green, and near-infrared fundus autofluorescence and color fundus photography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As there is a lack of reliable structural outcome parameters for posterior uveitis trials, we compared inter-rater reliability (IRR) of chorioretinal lesion area measurement (quantitative analyses) and characterization (qualitative analyses) on color fundus photography (CFP) and multimodal fundus autofluorescence (FAF). In this prospective cohort study, posterior uveitis eyes were imaged with CFP (Eidon, iCare, Vantaa), short- (swBAF, 450 nm; Eidon) and long-wavelength blue-light-autofluorescence (lwBAF, 488 nm), green-light-autofluorescence (GAF, 518 nm), and infrared-autofluorescence (IRAF, 787 nm) (all Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg). Lesion area, measured with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health), and image characteristics of lesions were graded on all modalities by two masked raters. A total of 318 lesions from 27 eyes (17 patients) were included. Absolute inter-rater differences in area measurement were 0.57, 0.78, 0.30, 0.36, and 0.55 in standardized 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.