Observational studyScientific reports2026
Radiomic analysis of abdominal non-contrast CT for identifying aortic syndrome in emergency patients.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics derived from abdominal non-contrast CT for identifying abdominal aortic syndrome (AS) in emergency patients. In this retrospective multicenter study, consecutive emergency patients who underwent both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between August 2012 and March 2022 were included. Radiomic features were extracted from the abdominal aorta segmented on non-contrast CT images, and a radiomic model was developed after feature selection and dimensionality reduction. A clinical-radiomics model was further developed by integrating the radiomics score with independent clinical predictors. Model performance was assessed using ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 267 patients were included, of whom 83 had AS. The radiomic model achieved AUCs of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.761-0.892), 0.821 (95% CI: 0.698-0.924), and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.633-0.937) across the training, internal test, and external validation sets, respectively. DCA showed similar net benefit for the radiomic and clinical-radiomics models, both exceeding that of the clinical model. A radiomics model based on non-contrast abdominal CT demonstrated moderate performance for identifying abdominal AS and may have potential value in emergency settings, although further prospective validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.