Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Overcoming resolution constraints in automated colony counting via a high-performance deep learning framework using SAHI.

Sercan Külcü, Duygu Balpetek Külcü

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sercan KülcüComputer Engineering Department, Giresun University, 28200, Giresun, Turkey. sercan.kulcu@giresun.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4871-709X
Duygu Balpetek KülcüFood Engineering Department, Giresun University, 28200, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-2654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lightweight models perform poorly in bacterial colony counting when high-resolution Petri dish images are downscaled to 640 × 640 pixels. This study addresses this issue using a tiled training and SAHI-based tiled inference pipeline. Full-resolution images are divided into overlapping 640 × 640 tiles (20% overlap), preserving native resolution and reducing colony density per tile. A public 24-class bacterial colony dataset was used to evaluate the proposed approach. The tiled strategy substantially increased the number of training samples while preserving local colony details. Three nano-scale models (YOLOv5n, YOLOv8n, YOLOv11n) were evaluated. The conventional resize method yielded only 44.9-66.3% mAP@0.5, whereas the tiled approach achieved 95.4-96.9% mAP@0.5 and 55.4-58.4% mAP@0.5:0.95. YOLOv11n with tiling achieved the highest mAP@0.5 while using only 2.6 million parameters. It reached 96.9% mAP@0.5 and 58.2% mAP@0.5:0.95, and the validation-set confusion matrix showed class-wise correct prediction rates above 95% in 23 of 24 classes. Whole-plate inference required less than 320 ms on a laptop RTX 3050 GPU. For small, densely packed objects such as bacterial colonies, tiled inference with moderate overlap dramatically outperforms both image resizing and recent architectural advances in YOLO. The proposed lightweight pipeline is suitable for routine laboratory deployment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialDetection AlgorithmsBacterial colony countingHigh-resolution imagingSAHISmall object detectionTiled inference

Identifiers

PMID42225748
PMCPMC13451340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.