ArticleScientific reports2026
Overcoming resolution constraints in automated colony counting via a high-performance deep learning framework using SAHI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lightweight models perform poorly in bacterial colony counting when high-resolution Petri dish images are downscaled to 640 × 640 pixels. This study addresses this issue using a tiled training and SAHI-based tiled inference pipeline. Full-resolution images are divided into overlapping 640 × 640 tiles (20% overlap), preserving native resolution and reducing colony density per tile. A public 24-class bacterial colony dataset was used to evaluate the proposed approach. The tiled strategy substantially increased the number of training samples while preserving local colony details. Three nano-scale models (YOLOv5n, YOLOv8n, YOLOv11n) were evaluated. The conventional resize method yielded only 44.9-66.3% mAP@0.5, whereas the tiled approach achieved 95.4-96.9% mAP@0.5 and 55.4-58.4% mAP@0.5:0.95. YOLOv11n with tiling achieved the highest mAP@0.5 while using only 2.6 million parameters. It reached 96.9% mAP@0.5 and 58.2% mAP@0.5:0.95, and the validation-set confusion matrix showed class-wise correct prediction rates above 95% in 23 of 24 classes. Whole-plate inference required less than 320 ms on a laptop RTX 3050 GPU. For small, densely packed objects such as bacterial colonies, tiled inference with moderate overlap dramatically outperforms both image resizing and recent architectural advances in YOLO. The proposed lightweight pipeline is suitable for routine laboratory deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.