ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid deep learning and ES-MDA for pressure transient inversion in radial composite reservoirs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate characterization of reservoir heterogeneity is important for improving reservoir management and production forecasting. This study presents a hybrid workflow for permeability estimation in structured radial composite reservoirs using deep learning (DL) and the Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ES-MDA). Prior to DL modeling, a quantitative sensitivity and identifiability analysis was performed to evaluate the information content of single-well pressure-transient data. The analysis examined the effects of inner-zone permeability, mobility ratio, and composite radius on pressure-derivative responses, showing that the dominant sensitivities are associated with near-well radial-composite parameters, while sensitivity decreases with increasing radial distance from the well. Two DL architectures-a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a fully connected (FC) network-were evaluated using synthetic pressure-derivative responses generated from radial composite reservoir realizations. The objective of the proposed framework is not to reconstruct arbitrary geological permeability fields, but rather to infer permeability distributions constrained by radial composite reservoir behavior. Both models achieved high prediction accuracy under noise-free conditions, while the CNN demonstrated greater robustness when Gaussian noise was added to the pressure-derivative inputs during testing. For history matching (HM), two initialization strategies were investigated: (i) random radial-composite initialization and (ii) AI-informed initialization derived from CNN predictions. Ten ensemble realizations were generated using ± 5% perturbations, followed by 20 ES-MDA assimilation steps with a constant inflation factor of α = 20. The AI-informed initialization achieved faster convergence and lower final pressure-derivative misfit than the random initialization. Overall, the proposed framework provides an efficient and physically consistent workflow for permeability estimation and history matching in structured radial composite reservoirs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.