ArticleScientific reports2026
Ground-station and ERA5-Land evaluation for heat-induced labour loss assessment across developed-economy regions in Pacific Asia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global warming is increasing extreme heat events, directly impacting labour health and economic productivity. High-resolution global reanalysis datasets, such as ERA5-Land, are enabling worldwide and regional assessments of heat-related labour impacts. This study systematically examines the reliability and bias of ERA5-Land-derived labour loss estimates across diverse Köppen-Geiger climate zones (A, C, D) and land cover types (urban and natural land cover) at 37 sites (including 36 WMO stations) in advanced-economy regions of Pacific Asia (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore) from 2014 to 2023. Using the physics-based Liljegren wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) model and established exposure-response functions, we quantified annual cumulative labour loss and productivity loss while accounting for spatial labour distribution. A comparison of WBGT‑derived labour‑loss estimates from 37 ground‑station datasets with ERA5‑Land-driven estimates indicates strong concordance in temperate zones (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.