ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid CNN-DNN model for battery remaining useful life RUL prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of lithium-ion batteries is essential for enhancing reliability, safety, and maintenance planning in energy storage systems. This study proposes an optimized hybrid deep learning framework that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks with Deep Neural Networks for effective battery remaining useful life prediction. The model leverages convolutional neural network layers to automatically extract discriminative features from multivariate battery degradation data, while deep neural network layers model complex nonlinear relationships for precise regression estimation. To further enhance predictive performance and reduce feature redundancy, Binary Particle Swarm Optimization is employed for optimal feature selection. Experiments were conducted using a publicly available lithium-ion battery degradation dataset comprising 680 samples with electrical, thermal, and health-related parameters, including State of Health and remaining useful life indicators. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and testing subsets with proportions of 70%, 15%, and 15%, respectively. A comprehensive performance evaluation was performed using Mean Squared Error, Mean Absolute Percentage Error, Median Absolute Error, Mean Absolute Error, and the coefficient of determination. The proposed hybrid model achieved superior performance with a Mean Squared Error of 0.0141, Mean Absolute Error of 0.0931, Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 0.0142, Median Absolute Error of 0.0739, and a coefficient of determination of 99.01%, significantly outperforming comparative deep learning models. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework provides a robust and accurate solution for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction and supports its potential deployment in intelligent battery management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.