Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225696›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Exploring the conformational landscape of adenylate kinase and beyond with protein folding models.

Aryan Bhasin, Antoine Delaunay, Francesco Saccon, Yunguan Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aryan BhasinInstaDeep Ltd., London, W2 1AY, UK.
Antoine DelaunayInstaDeep Ltd., London, W2 1AY, UK. a.delaunay@instadeep.com.
Francesco SacconInstaDeep Ltd., London, W2 1AY, UK.
Yunguan FuInstaDeep Ltd., London, W2 1AY, UK. y.fu@instadeep.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding models have revolutionized structure prediction but struggle to capture conformational flexibility. Recent studies perturb inputs or parameters to sample alternative conformations, while diffusion-based approaches generate conformational ensembles directly. While individual generative models have been benchmarked against molecular dynamics (MD) data, a systematic comparison across diverse methodologies remains scarce, and validation of sub-domain dynamics is still limited. Here, we present a systematic benchmark of nine methods across 20 monomeric proteins with active and inactive states. We extend the pairwise aligned error metric to ensembles and reveal that protein identity exerts a non-negligible influence on model performance. Focusing on Adenylate Kinase, a well-studied enzyme with extensive MD data, we find that Chai-1 performs the best in recovering known conformations, identifying mobile regions, and capturing plausible intermediate conformations. These results highlight the potential of generative models as efficient alternatives to MD for exploring protein conformational dynamics and provide a rigorous benchmark for sampling the protein conformational landscape.

Indexed as

Adenylate KinaseProtein FoldingModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationAdenylate KinaseAdenylate kinaseConformational samplingProtein folding

Identifiers

PMID42225696
PMCPMC13226675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.