Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225693›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A dataset from ten disasters for studying location descriptions and training AI models.

Kai Sun, Yingjie Hu, Kenneth Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai SunGeoAI Lab, Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Yingjie HuGeoAI Lab, Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. yhu42@buffalo.edu.
Kenneth JosephDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2117771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People have been increasingly using social media to post messages during a natural disaster, and describe the locations of victims, damages, difficult situations, and relief resources. Many of these location descriptions are in the forms of detailed and multi-entity descriptions, such as door number addresses, road intersections, and highway exits. Currently, there is limited availability of datasets that contain these detailed location descriptions labeled in disaster-related messages. A lack of these datasets hinders the understanding of how people describe locations during disasters and the automatic extraction of these location descriptions. This paper fills this gap by providing a dataset that covers ten disasters in the United States and in five disaster types: hurricanes, floods, wildfires, tornados, and winter storms. The messages containing location descriptions are collected from the social media platform Twitter/X, and we describe the collection, labeling, and validation of this dataset. This dataset can be used for studying the ways people describe locations under disaster contexts and for training AI models to extract these important locations.

Identifiers

PMID42225693
PMCPMC13522336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.