ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical and tribological response of red brick dust filled hemp-epoxy composites using response surface methodology and machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study focuses on the wear and mechanical properties of epoxy-based hybrid composites that contain hemp fiber and red brick dust (RBD). The hand lay-up method is used for making composites using hemp fiber (40 wt%) reinforced epoxy with varied RBD loading up to 15 wt%. The prepared samples are assessed by investigating their physical, mechanical and tribological behavior. The results revealed that the density increased from 1.257 to 1.338 g/cm³ with increasing RBD content, while tensile and flexural strengths decreased by approximately 13.3 and 7.4%, respectively, at 15 wt% filler loading. In contrast, impact strength and hardness improved significantly, showing enhancements of 144 and 152%, respectively, compared to neat epoxy. The sliding wear tests are also carried out in accordance with the L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.