ArticleScientific reports2026
An artificial intelligence model for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still occurs in patients with hepatitis C who achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) after direct-acting antiviral therapy. We developed and validated an AI-assisted HCC prediction model using longitudinal data in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had achieved SVR. A total of 1,984 HCV patients who achieved SVR from ten hospitals in South Korea were included in the derivation cohort. External validation cohorts were recruited nationwide at 29 university-affiliated hospitals. Machine learning models were trained with parameters at baseline, one year after treatment, and both time points, respectively, and their performance was assessed via Harrell's c-index and 5-year AUROC. Age, platelet, AST, ALT, bilirubin, and albumin at baseline and one year after treatment were significant predictors of HCC risk. A random forest model trained with longitudinal inputs presented a superior performance in comparison to machine learning models with parameters at a single time point provided, yielding Harrell's c-index of 0.886/0.796 and 5-year AUROC of 0.903/0.820 for internal/external validation cohorts. Furthermore, compared with previous HCC risk scores, the new model exhibited markedly enhanced discriminatory capability. The findings suggest that a machine learning based model may serve as a useful tool for predicting HCC after SVR in chronic hepatitis C patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.