Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225608›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026

Simulation, artificial intelligence, and competency-based frameworks in veterinary medical education: a narrative review.

Hui Zhang, Aoyun Li, Ying Li, Fazul Nabi, Hailong Dong, Yongjiang Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui ZhangDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-5065
Aoyun LiDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China. aoyunli@henau.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-0872
Ying LiDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. lying@scau.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5539-0235
Fazul NabiDepartment of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam 70060, Pakistan. fazulnabishar@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-4124
Hailong DongDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Science, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi 860000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3958-6726
Yongjiang MaDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. mayongjiang@scau.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7354-9686

Funding

Key Project of the Society of Veterinary Internal Medicine and Clinical Diagnostics-CAASVM SYNZ-JG-2024-A02Research on the Teaching Reform of Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education in Higher Agricultural and Forestry Universities in 2025 nllm202501South China Agricultural University Typical Case 47Teaching Science Research Project of Xizang XZEDIP230008Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University JG2024-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceVeterinary medical education is rapidly evolving through the adoption of simulation, virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), and competency-based frameworks. These innovations aim to address long-standing challenges such as limited patient availability, variable case exposure, and inconsistent assessment practices across institutions. OBSERVATIONS: Existing studies show that high-fidelity simulators and VR improve procedural confidence, skill acquisition, and learner satisfaction while reducing the dependence on live animals. AI-assisted learning systems support decision-making and personalized instruction but raise concerns about accuracy, bias, and data governance. Competency-based education frameworks, including entrustable professional activities and programmatic assessment, can improve workplace readiness, but their application varies widely between veterinary schools. Persistent barriers include unequal access to digital resources, high implementation costs, and limited faculty training. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Evidence from the literature suggests that, when integrated appropriately, simulation technologies, digital learning environments, and AI-assisted tools collectively enhance the key elements of veterinary training. These approaches can support safer clinical practice, help standardize skill development, and broaden access to quality training, particularly in resource-limited settings. Instead of hypothesizing new mechanisms, this review uses current evidence to highlight practical implications for curriculum design and clinical preparedness. Continued investment in faculty development, ethical use of AI, and infrastructure is essential for achieving sustainable, technology-enhanced veterinary education.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCompetency-Based EducationEducation, VeterinaryAnimalsClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansVirtual RealityBlended learningeducation, veterinaryentrustable professional activitiesfaculty developmentvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42225608
PMCPMC13236464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.