ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026
Simulation, artificial intelligence, and competency-based frameworks in veterinary medical education: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceVeterinary medical education is rapidly evolving through the adoption of simulation, virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), and competency-based frameworks. These innovations aim to address long-standing challenges such as limited patient availability, variable case exposure, and inconsistent assessment practices across institutions. OBSERVATIONS: Existing studies show that high-fidelity simulators and VR improve procedural confidence, skill acquisition, and learner satisfaction while reducing the dependence on live animals. AI-assisted learning systems support decision-making and personalized instruction but raise concerns about accuracy, bias, and data governance. Competency-based education frameworks, including entrustable professional activities and programmatic assessment, can improve workplace readiness, but their application varies widely between veterinary schools. Persistent barriers include unequal access to digital resources, high implementation costs, and limited faculty training. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Evidence from the literature suggests that, when integrated appropriately, simulation technologies, digital learning environments, and AI-assisted tools collectively enhance the key elements of veterinary training. These approaches can support safer clinical practice, help standardize skill development, and broaden access to quality training, particularly in resource-limited settings. Instead of hypothesizing new mechanisms, this review uses current evidence to highlight practical implications for curriculum design and clinical preparedness. Continued investment in faculty development, ethical use of AI, and infrastructure is essential for achieving sustainable, technology-enhanced veterinary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.