ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2026
International disruptions to cancer diagnosis and stage at presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: an International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) population-based study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in oncological surgical volume and postoperative survival during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective multicenter study in a regional German hospital network.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Changes in life expectancy due to trends in cancer mortality rates, Spain 1980 - 2024.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on cancer services globally. There is a crucial need to understand how the incidence and stage of major cancer types were affected internationally. We aimed to assess these metrics in seven countries within the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.
methodsThis population-based study used data on 2·6 million patients diagnosed with primary cancers of the colon, rectum, lung, prostate, female breast, ovary, and melanoma of the skin, between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2020. Data were collected from cancer registries in 18 jurisdictions from seven countries participating in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership; Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, and the UK. The main outcomes of monthly cases and age-standardised incidence rates by site during the pandemic (April 1 to Dec 31, 2020) were compared with predictions for the same year based on pre-pandemic trends (Jan 1, 2015, to Dec 31, 2019).
findingsBetween April 1, and Dec 31, 2020, 55 713 (16%) of 347 666 expected cases were predicted to be missing, with the largest deficits seen for prostate cancer (24%), female breast cancer (18%), and melanoma (18%), and the smallest deficits seen for ovarian (4%) and lung cancer (8%). The largest difference between observed and predicted incidence rates for prostate cancer was seen in the UK (164·9 per 100 000 person-years predicted vs 101·4 per 100 000 person-years observed) and the smallest difference seen in Norway (164·1 vs 168·4). Reductions in incidence were greatest from April 1, to July 31, versus from Aug 1, to Dec 31, in 2020. The percentage deficits between observed and predicted cases were 54% (UK) and 36% (Ireland) for prostate cancer, 40% (UK) and 34% (Ireland) for breast cancer, and 40% (UK) and 35% (Canada) for melanoma.
interpretationThe pandemic's greatest impact was during the first few months of societal lockdowns in 2020 when barriers in access to health care were greatest. Further research is needed to understand whether patients with a missed diagnosis were diagnosed at a later date and if they presented at a later stage.
fundingCanadian Partnership Against Cancer; Cancer Council Victoria; Cancer Institute New South Wales; Cancer Research UK; Danish Cancer Society; National Cancer Registry Ireland; The Higher Education Authority North South Research Programme, Health Data Research UK; Te Aho o Te Kahu, Cancer Control Agency New Zealand; New Zealand Cancer Society; National Health Service England; Norwegian Cancer Society; Public Health Agency Northern Ireland, on behalf of the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry; The Scottish Government; Western Australia Department of Health; and Wales Cancer Network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.