Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42224738›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026

Flow-mediated pseudolesion mimicking an intracranial aneurysm secondary to cervical internal carotid artery dissection: illustrative case.

Feng Zeng, Feng Wen, Kaikai Fu, Wenjie Lin, Qiyong Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai.
Feng WenCollege of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Kaikai FuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai.
Wenjie LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai.
Qiyong MeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemodynamic alterations caused by internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection (ICAD) may obscure the identification of intracranial aneurysms. These flow disturbances can compromise angiographic assessment and influence therapeutic decision-making. OBSERVATIONS: A 51-year-old female patient underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which initially suggested the presence of a supraclinoid ICA aneurysm, prompting a referral for surgical intervention. However, anomalous collateral circulation patterns raised suspicion of proximal ICA pathology. Subsequent focused angiography identified a cervical ICA origin dissection. After endovascular stent placement, repeat imaging demonstrated that the previously observed "aneurysm" was in fact a hemodynamically distorted posterior communicating artery infundibulum. Thus, the scheduled craniotomy was deemed unnecessary and canceled. LESSONS: This report represents the first documented instance of a flow-mediated pseudolesion mimicking an intracranial aneurysm secondary to proximal ICAD. Although DSA remains the diagnostic criterion standard, this case underscores the potential for hemodynamic artifacts to yield misinterpretations. Comprehensive evaluation of cerebrovascular flow dynamics is essential to mitigate diagnostic errors and prevent unwarranted invasive procedures. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25652.

Indexed as

arterial infundibulumhemodynamically pseudolesionICADinternal carotid artery dissectionUIAunruptured intracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID42224738
PMCPMC13224976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.