Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42224602›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Rethinking energy transition strategies for the European Union amid rising energy prices.

Wenjun Meng, Jaime Nieto, Dabo Guan, Jing Meng, Robert Sander, Ulrich Pöschl, Klaus Hubacek, Hang Su, Shu Tao, Yafang Cheng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenjun MengAerosol Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-8044
Jaime NietoResearch Group on Energy, Economy and System Dynamics, Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47011, Spain.
Dabo GuanDepartment of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-3403
Jing MengThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8708-0485
Robert SanderInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg A-2361, Austria.
Ulrich PöschlMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-3557
Klaus HubacekIntegrated Research on Energy, Environment and Society, Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2561-6090
Hang SuInstitute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Shu TaoCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-7063
Yafang ChengAerosol Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4912-9879

Funding

Horizon Europe 101137905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolitical tensions and the disruption of major energy imports have sharply elevated energy prices across the European Union (EU), creating a persistent energy supply gap and posing long-term challenges for energy security. Here, we introduce a comprehensive framework integrating the advanced Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model with a system dynamic WILIAM ("Within limits") Integrated Assessment Model to systematically evaluate strategies for closing this energy gap. We find that measures to close the energy gap in the short term exacerbate either economic or public health burdens, highlighting the need for more sustainable solutions in the long term. Our further analysis shows that long-term strategies focused on renewable energy transitions not only close the energy gap but also bring net benefits equivalent to ~3% of projected GDP for 2050. Moreover, we find that rising energy prices substantially influence the cost-effectiveness of accelerated energy transitions. Under current high energy price levels, the benefits from achieving energy targets set for 2050 by 5 to 20 y in advance could outweigh the additional costs. The consideration of dynamic trends in the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), particularly under rapid renewables expansion, is critical for avoiding overly optimistic estimations of green transition benefits. Our findings suggest that a timely transition to renewable energy benefits the EU in the face of the energy crisis, and policies proactively adjusting energy prices could facilitate a greener, more sustainable future.

Indexed as

air qualitycost analysisenergy priceenergy transitionhealth benefits

Identifiers

PMID42224602
PMCPMC13250444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.