ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Rethinking energy transition strategies for the European Union amid rising energy prices.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Geopolitical tensions and the disruption of major energy imports have sharply elevated energy prices across the European Union (EU), creating a persistent energy supply gap and posing long-term challenges for energy security. Here, we introduce a comprehensive framework integrating the advanced Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model with a system dynamic WILIAM ("Within limits") Integrated Assessment Model to systematically evaluate strategies for closing this energy gap. We find that measures to close the energy gap in the short term exacerbate either economic or public health burdens, highlighting the need for more sustainable solutions in the long term. Our further analysis shows that long-term strategies focused on renewable energy transitions not only close the energy gap but also bring net benefits equivalent to ~3% of projected GDP for 2050. Moreover, we find that rising energy prices substantially influence the cost-effectiveness of accelerated energy transitions. Under current high energy price levels, the benefits from achieving energy targets set for 2050 by 5 to 20 y in advance could outweigh the additional costs. The consideration of dynamic trends in the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), particularly under rapid renewables expansion, is critical for avoiding overly optimistic estimations of green transition benefits. Our findings suggest that a timely transition to renewable energy benefits the EU in the face of the energy crisis, and policies proactively adjusting energy prices could facilitate a greener, more sustainable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.