Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42224424›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Learning under uncertainty-Conservation of populations and persistence of dynamic resources through adaptive switching feedback controllers.

Phoebe Smith, Chris Guiver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phoebe SmithDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-1980
Chris GuiverSchool of Computing, Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-7020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of conservation under uncertainty, the problem of designing and analysing adaptive switching feedback control schemes for systems of positive difference equations is considered. The aim is to ensure persistence of the population, corresponding to the zero equilibrium of the closed-loop control system being unstable in a certain sense. A robust control approach is adopted, where multiple discrete control actions are available, corresponding to different management strategies or policies. However, the exact effect of each strategy is assumed to be uncertain. Based on principles from both positive dynamical systems and simple adaptive feedback control, a suite of control schemes is proposed from which a destabilising (persistent) strategy is selected based on a switching process, should such a strategy exist. We demonstrate that the switching rules can be augmented with several variations, altering the transient behaviour and thus tailoring them to the particular requirements of the user. The current work substantially builds upon and enhances earlier results of the authors, by establishing key and quite general hypotheses of the underlying model and control scheme to ensure persistence, so that the results are applicable to a wide range of model types. The proposed control schemes are illustrated with examples.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFeedbackLearningModels, TheoreticalPopulation DynamicsAlgorithmsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42224424
PMCPMC13225672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.