ArticleGynecologic and obstetric investigation2026
Interdisciplinary Implementation of the International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Care Gaps and Knowledge Deficits in Key High-Burden Domains.
Article in Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders among women of reproductive age and is associated with significant metabolic, reproductive, and psychological morbidity. Although international evidence-based guidelines exist, patient reports continue to indicate unmet needs, particularly in areas that most affect quality of life. The primary objective of this study was to assess PCOS-related knowledge, as well as general practitioners' (GPs) perceptions and interdisciplinary communication practices. A secondary objective was to examine whether identified knowledge gaps among GPs align with symptom domains reported by patients as most bothersome.
designThis study employed a cross-sectional survey design targeting practicing GPs. Quantitative findings were descriptively analyzed and contextualized using published data from an independent, large-scale patient survey. Participants/Materials: A total of 918 GPs practicing in the federal state of Hesse, Germany, were invited to participate. The final analytical sample comprised 118 GPs who completed the survey. The GP questionnaire included demographic and professional characteristics as well as a 21-item knowledge assessment derived from the 2018 International PCOS Guideline. To contextualize GP findings, data from a published patient survey including 1,926 individuals with PCOS were used to identify patient-prioritized symptom domains.
settingThe study was conducted in primary care settings across Hesse, Germany.
methodsThe GP survey assessed awareness of PCOS prevalence, familiarity with guideline recommendations, perceived relevance of guidelines to daily practice, and interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly with gynecologists. Knowledge accuracy scores were calculated as the percentage of correct responses across the 21 items. Subgroup analyses explored associations between GP characteristics and knowledge levels. Published patient survey data were used to determine symptom burden and domains perceived as most distressing, allowing comparison with GP knowledge gaps.
resultsA total of 93.2% of GPs estimated PCOS prevalence in their practice below 5% and 69.5% considered the International PCOS Guideline irrelevant to routine practice. PCOS-related knowledge among participants showed a mean accuracy of 54.6% (95% CI: 50.4-58.8) across all domains, with the lowest scores in reproductive aspects (45.5%, 95% CI: 40.6-50.4) and hyperandrogenism (43.7%, 95% CI: 38.7-48.7). Notably, cosmetic manifestations of hyperandrogenism were identified by patients as among the most burdensome symptoms. Furthermore, 45.8% of GPs reported suboptimal communication with gynecologists, highlighting deficiencies in interdisciplinary care pathways. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a low response rate with potential nonresponse bias, the newly developed questionnaire without formal psychometric validation, and reliance on self-reported data. In addition, variation in patient populations across practices and the lack of linkage between physician responses and patient outcomes may limit generalizability.
conclusionsPCOS-related knowledge gaps among GPs are most pronounced in clinical domains that patients perceive as most distressing, highlighting a critical mismatch between care provision and patient needs. These findings underscore the necessity for targeted educational interventions, improved dissemination and implementation of PCOS guidelines in primary care, and strengthened interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance patient-centered PCOS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.