ArticlePloS one2026
Residual-guided hybrid framework for adversarially robust deep learning-based network intrusion detection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing sophistication of cyber threats and adversarial attacks poses critical challenges to the security and robustness of machine learning models deployed in real-world systems. While traditional deep learning architectures excel in clean data classification, they often fail under adversarial perturbations, exposing vulnerabilities in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and industrial control. In this paper, we introduce a novel hybrid adversarially-trained deep learning framework that integrates reinforcement learning-inspired robustness adaptation with knowledge-driven regularization to achieve improved resilience against fast gradient sign method (FGSM) and projected gradient descent (PGD) attacks. Our approach simultaneously optimizes clean accuracy and adversarial robustness by balancing cross-entropy and adversarial loss components, while monitoring calibration error, gradient dynamics, and generalization gap to ensure stable convergence. Extensive experiments on reconnaissance, shellcode, and worms datasets demonstrate that the proposed model achieves up to 97.88% accuracy on clean data and maintains 84.9% accuracy under FGSM and 81.75% under PGD attacks, outperforming convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) baselines by more than 6-10 percentage points in adversarial robustness. Furthermore, the training curves reveal consistent improvements in convergence stability, runtime efficiency, gradient norm decay, and a 30% reduction in expected calibration error, validating the scalability of the framework. This work contributes not only a novel adversarial defense paradigm but also provides insights into the trade-offs between robustness, efficiency, and generalization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.