ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
High infection risk of intestinal helminths despite WASH interventions: A cross-sectional study in Khammouane province, Lao PDR.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the widespread implementation of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) program over the last two decades, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) remains highly endemic for intestinal helminth infections. We assessed the intestinal helminth infections burden and the link with WASH levels in an area with WASH interventions.
methodA cross-sectional study was conducted across 81 villages in Khammouane province, Lao PDR, where WASH interventions were implemented. Villages and 30 participants (aged 18-87 years) per village were randomly selected. Demographics, individual and household data, including WASH-related factors were collected. Stool samples were examined for intestinal helminth infections using formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risks associated with intestinal helminth infections.
resultsA total of 1530 participants were included. Multi-helminth species infection was very common, e.g., 30.1% had a double infection. Opisthorchis viverrini was most prevalent (56.9%), followed by hookworm (54.7%), minute intestinal flukes (22.7%), and Trichostrongylus spp. (10.7%). Overall, 56.1% and 44.4% had access to safely management water services and sanitation facilities, respectively, and 17.7% practiced open defecation. Improved WASH levels were not associated with reduced intestinal helminth infections. District of residence, age, gender and raw food consumption predicted helminth infections. E.g., O. viverrini infection was associated with residency in Mahaxai district (Mahaxai, aOR = 14.0; 95% CI = 9.5-20.6; p < 0.001 and Bulapha, aOR = 3.0; 95% CI = 2.0-4.4; p < 0.001).
conclusionOur findings indicate a high intestinal helminth infections burden in this province, with several risk factors such as location, age, gender and consumption of raw food predicting helminth infection. Improved WASH levels are not associated with reduces prevalence of intestinal helminth infection in this cross-sectional study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.