ArticlePloS one2026
Patient perspectives on delays in care for kidney stones: A qualitative analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraditional insurance claims dataset analyses have exposed disparities in treatment delays for kidney stones along lines of socio-economic status, particularly among patients who are underinsured and/or racial/ethnic minorities. Analyzing patient experiences through qualitative semi-structured interviews allows for elucidation of common root causes leading to care delays in patients with kidney stones. MATERIALS AND
methods20 participants were recruited from a group of adult patients at a safety net hospital and academic medical center who had been referred for urological care after presenting to the Emergency Department for kidney stones. Patients were selected for semi-structured interviews if they failed to present to the urology clinic after 60 days of referral placement. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsOf the 20 participants, the median age in years was 46 (range 22-72), 50% identified as female, 40% were White, 40% were Hispanic, 20% were Black, and 20% were Spanish-dominant. The median delay was 105 days. Thematic analysis identified patient-extrinsic obstacles in obtaining timely care in the form of care costs and skepticism from health care providers, such as perceptions of being drug-seeking or feigning pain. We further identified patient-intrinsic obstacles, such as gaps in understanding of the dangers of stone disease and difficulty navigating care coordination.
conclusionsThis study provides insights into multi-level factors that impact care delays for patients with kidney stone disease. Findings from this work deepen understanding of why patient experiences in care delays manifest along lines of socio-economic status and can inform future interventions to reduce disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.