Trial reportAutism : the international journal of research and practice2026
Assess the Fidelity, Validity and Responsiveness of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) to Measure Changes in the Social Interactions of Preschool Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Trial report in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately measuring changes in core autism symptoms following early intervention is challenging. The Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) is a promising tool for assessing social interactions in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, data on its responsiveness remain limited, warranting validation to support its use in evaluating treatment-related changes. This study aimed to assess the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the BOSCC based on international recommendations from the COSMIN expert group. The BOSCC was rated using 414 video observations from a large multicenter randomized controlled trial including 177 preschoolers with ASD between 19 and 36 months. Videos were coded using the original BOSCC protocol by trained, blinded raters. Analyses addressed reliability, structural and convergent validity, and responsiveness over a 2-year follow-up. Interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability were consistently high, with good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.88-0.98). Factor analysis supported a three-factor structure. Convergent validity was modest with Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale (ADOS) change scores (r = 0.05-0.20) but stronger with global ratings of improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I; r = 0.40-0.60, p < 0.001). ROC analyses confirmed acceptable to good responsiveness when anchored to the CGI-I, but poor discrimination relative to the ADOS. The BOSCC is a reliable and responsive measure of change in preschoolers with ASD. Its naturalistic format supports its use as an outcome measure in early intervention trials. Establishing thresholds for clinically meaningful change will be a critical next step for both research and clinical practice.Lay AbstractEarly intervention may improve social interaction and communication in young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, it is often difficult to measure changes in core autism symptoms over time. Many commonly used assessment tools were developed for diagnosis and are not always sensitive to treatment-related change. The Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) was specifically designed to address this gap by using short, naturalistic observations of children's social communication. This study examined how well the BOSCC works as a tool to capture change. We assessed its reliability (whether it gives consistent results), validity (whether it measures what it is intended to measure), and responsiveness (whether it can detect change over time). The study included 414 video observations from a large multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 177 preschool children with ASD, aged 19-36 months, followed up for over a 2-year period. Videos were rated by trained, independent observers using the original BOSCC coding system. Results showed that BOSCC is a highly reliable measure, with strong agreement between different raters and good consistency over time. The structure of the scale was supported, and BOSCC scores were meaningfully related to clinicians' overall judgments of improvement. In contrast, changes in BOSCC scores were less closely related to changes measured by standard diagnostic tools. Overall, these findings support the BOSCC as a useful and sensitive outcome measure for evaluating change in early autism interventions. Future research should define thresholds for clinically meaningful change to strengthen its use in research, clinical practice, and service evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.