Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42224197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Protocol for RETRO-TBI: A prospective cohort study of mild traumatic brain injury in older adults.

Jennifer S Albrecht, Odessa Addison, Neeraj Badjatia, Mary K Bahr-Robertson, Lynn M Grattan, Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Rosemary Kozar, Jay Magaziner, Denise L Orwig, Michelle Newman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer S AlbrechtDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-2274
Odessa AddisonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Neeraj BadjatiaDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-9034
Mary K Bahr-RobertsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Lynn M GrattanDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Ann L Gruber-BaldiniDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Rosemary KozarShock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jay MagazinerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Denise L OrwigDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Michelle NewmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Deborah StevensDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Emerson M WickwireDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Yuanyuan LiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults experience the highest rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) related hospitalizations and deaths of any age group, yet TBI remains understudied in this population. To improve understanding of recovery over the year following TBI among older adults, we designed the RETRO-TBI study. This manuscript reports the protocol for RETRO-TBI, a prospective cohort study of older adults (65 years and older) with mild TBI (mTBI) with planned enrollment of 250 participants. The study is designed to evaluate recovery across four key domains: physical function, cognitive function, psychological function, and sleep quality. Participants are followed for 12 months after injury, with in-home study visits conducted at approximately 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Blood samples are collected at all visits. The specific aims are to: (1) identify trajectories of recovery in physical function and predictors of poorer physical recovery; (2) identify trajectories of recovery in cognitive function, psychological function, and sleep quality and predictors of poorer recovery in these domains; and (3) examine associations among recovery trajectories across domains. The RETRO-TBI study represents an important step in addressing the knowledge gap on recovery following TBI among older adults and is expected to result in identification of sub-groups of individuals more likely to have poor recovery, informing individualized treatment plans and development of future domain-based rehabilitation strategies. The study has several strengths including its focus on older adults, evaluation of recovery across four domains of function, and longitudinal assessments will permit evaluation of heterogeneity in recovery trajectories.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionSleep Quality

Identifiers

PMID42224197
PMCPMC13225355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.